| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 199 | |
| 8. |  | MÉNDEZ, R.; OXLEY, A. Agroclimatología. Información climática. ln: [JORNADA ANUAL] ARROZ-SOJA, 2015, Treinta y Tres, UY. Resultados experimentales 2014-2015. Treinta y Tres: INIA, 2015. cap. 1, p. 1-2. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 748)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|    |
| 18. | | MENDEZ, R.; ROEL, A. Bioclimático de cuatro variedades. Ecofisiología del cultivo. ln: INIA TREINTA Y TRES. Arroz: resultados experimentales 2000-2001. Treinta y Tres (Uruguay): INIA, 2001. cap. 2, p. 8-18. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 257)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 19. | | MÉNDEZ, R.; DEAMBROSI, E. Bioclimático de variedades y líneas experimentales. Ecofisiología del cultivo de arroz. Evaluación de la respuesta a bajas temperaturas en cultivares de arroz. ln: INIA TREINTA Y TRES. Arroz: Resultados experimentales 2008-2009. Treinta y Tres (Uruguay): INIA, 2009. Cap. 8, p. 16-18. (INIA Actividades de Difusión; 571)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 199 | |
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
19/09/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
19/09/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
PUNTEL, L.A.; BOLFE, E.L.; MELCHIORI, R.J.M.; ORTEGA, R.; TISCORNIA, G.; ROEL, A.; SCARAMUZZA, F.; BEST, S.; BERGER, A.; HANSEL, D.S.S.; PALACIOS DURÁN, D.; BALBOA, G.R. |
|
Afiliación : |
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA.; Embrapa Agricultura Digital, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Campinas, Brazil. CDepartment of Geography, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.; Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria EEA, Paraná, Argentina.; Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Santiago, Chile.; GUADALUPE TISCORNIA TOSAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALVARO ROEL DELLAZOPPA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria EEA, Manfredi, Argentina.; Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Quilamapu, Chile.; ANDRES GUSTAVO BERGER RICCA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Corteva Agriscience, Passo Fundo, Brazil.; Modag, Chanco, Chile // Colegio de Ingenieros Agron´omos, Santiago, Chile.; Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA. |
|
Título : |
How digital is agriculture in a subset of countries from South America? Adoption and limitations. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Crop and Pasture Science, 2022, Special Issue, Review. CP21759. Open Access. doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/CP21759 |
|
ISBN : |
10.1071/CP21759 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Submitted: 9 November 2021 Accepted: 13 July 2022 Published online: 16 September 2022.
Correspondence to: L.A. Puntel Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA Email: lpuntel2@unl.edu; G.R. Balboa: gbalboa7@unl.edu
Archivo con material suplementario |
|
Contenido : |
Digital agriculture (DA) can contribute solutions to meet an increase in healthy, nutritious, and affordable food demands in an efficient and sustainable way. South America (SA) is one of the main grain and protein producers in the world but the status of DA in the region is unknown. A systematic review and case studies from Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile were conducted to address the following objectives: (1) quantify adoption of existing DA technologies, (2) identify limitations for DA adoption; and (3) summarise existing metrics to benchmark DA benefits. Level of DA adoption was led by Brazil and Argentina followed by Uruguay and at a slower rate, Chile. GPS guidance systems, mapping tools, mobile apps and remote sensing were the most adopted DA technologies in SA. The most reported limitations to adoption were technology cost, lack of training, limited number of companies providing services, and unclear benefits from DA. Across the case studies, there was no clear definition of DA. To mitigate some of these limitations, our findings suggest the need for a DA educational curriculum that can fulfill the demand for job skills such as data processing, analysis and interpretation. Regional efforts are needed to standardise these metrics. This will allow stakeholders to design targeted initiatives to promote DA towards sustainability of food production in the region. |
|
Palabras claves : |
AGRICULTURE 4.0; DIGITAL AGRICULTURE; DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES; REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT; SOUTH AMERICA; SUSTENTABILIDAD; SUSTENTABILITY; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16765/1/Crop-pasture-science-2022-Puntel.pdf
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16766/1/Crop-pasture-science-2022-Puntel-suplementary-material.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02770naa a2200361 a 4500
001 1063574
005 2022-09-19
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aPUNTEL, L.A.
245 $aHow digital is agriculture in a subset of countries from South America? Adoption and limitations.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Submitted: 9 November 2021 Accepted: 13 July 2022 Published online: 16 September 2022. Correspondence to: L.A. Puntel Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA Email: lpuntel2@unl.edu; G.R. Balboa: gbalboa7@unl.edu Archivo con material suplementario
520 $aDigital agriculture (DA) can contribute solutions to meet an increase in healthy, nutritious, and affordable food demands in an efficient and sustainable way. South America (SA) is one of the main grain and protein producers in the world but the status of DA in the region is unknown. A systematic review and case studies from Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile were conducted to address the following objectives: (1) quantify adoption of existing DA technologies, (2) identify limitations for DA adoption; and (3) summarise existing metrics to benchmark DA benefits. Level of DA adoption was led by Brazil and Argentina followed by Uruguay and at a slower rate, Chile. GPS guidance systems, mapping tools, mobile apps and remote sensing were the most adopted DA technologies in SA. The most reported limitations to adoption were technology cost, lack of training, limited number of companies providing services, and unclear benefits from DA. Across the case studies, there was no clear definition of DA. To mitigate some of these limitations, our findings suggest the need for a DA educational curriculum that can fulfill the demand for job skills such as data processing, analysis and interpretation. Regional efforts are needed to standardise these metrics. This will allow stakeholders to design targeted initiatives to promote DA towards sustainability of food production in the region.
653 $aAGRICULTURE 4.0
653 $aDIGITAL AGRICULTURE
653 $aDIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES
653 $aREGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
653 $aSOUTH AMERICA
653 $aSUSTENTABILIDAD
653 $aSUSTENTABILITY
653 $aTECHNOLOGY ADOPTION
700 1 $aBOLFE, E.L.
700 1 $aMELCHIORI, R.J.M.
700 1 $aORTEGA, R.
700 1 $aTISCORNIA, G.
700 1 $aROEL, A.
700 1 $aSCARAMUZZA, F.
700 1 $aBEST, S.
700 1 $aBERGER, A.
700 1 $aHANSEL, D.S.S.
700 1 $aPALACIOS DURÁN, D.
700 1 $aBALBOA, G.R.
773 $tCrop and Pasture Science, 2022, Special Issue, Review. CP21759. Open Access. doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/CP21759
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
